This Exam P sample reference tests Poisson Distribution. This problem recovers a one-period Poisson mean from the identity E[X²]=λ²+λ. Scaling that mean to fifteen periods and complementing counts zero through two gives 0.655362 and choice A.
These notes identify the calculation error associated with each wrong letter when that error is reproducible.
BTreating the raw second moment 0.2756 as the one-period mean gives interval mean 4.134 and tail probability 0.780881, which rounds to 0.781.
CA tail probability of 0.805 would require interval mean about 4.319, or one-period mean about 0.288. That parameter has second moment λ+λ² about 0.371, not 0.2756.
DUsing the correct interval mean but complementing only counts zero and one gives Pr(Y>1)=0.850266. That calculates at least two events, not more than two.
EUsing 0.2756 as the one-period mean and also complementing only zero and one gives 0.917760, which rounds to 0.918. It combines the raw-moment error with the threshold error.
Original practice · fully worked
Original variant: covariance of overlapping event windows
Events in a system log follow a homogeneous Poisson process. For the count N in one hour, E[N²]=6. Let A count events from time 0 to 90 minutes, and let B count events from time 30 to 120 minutes. Calculate Cov(A,B).
A 0 covariance units
B 1 covariance unit
C 2 covariance units
D 3 covariance units
E 6 covariance units
Variant answer in brief
The moment equation λ²+λ=6 gives rate 2 per hour. The two windows share one hour, and only the count in that shared interval contributes covariance, so Cov(A,B)=2 and choice C.
Setup
Setup
Recover the hourly Poisson rate from the raw second moment.
λ2+λ=6
λ=2
Model
Model
Split the two observation windows into disjoint half-hour, one-hour, and half-hour increments.
A=U+V,B=V+W
U,V,W are independent,V∼Poisson(2)
Compute
Compute
All cross-covariances vanish except the variance of the shared increment.
The 3108-page Probability Proof Manual reorganizes 718 verified Exam P solutions by syllabus skill and adds formula proofs, error patterns, and original worked practice.