This Exam FM sample reference tests Duration and Convexity. Modified duration 8 at yield 6.4% implies Macaulay duration 8.512; the Macaulay and modified estimates are 107,676 and 107,533, differing by 143, choice E.
These notes identify the calculation error associated with each wrong letter when that error is reproducible.
AChoice A is inconsistent with the paired Macaulay-ratio and modified-linear estimates; no distinct standard single-step error producing it is identifiable.
BChoice B is inconsistent with the paired Macaulay-ratio and modified-linear estimates; no distinct standard single-step error producing it is identifiable.
CChoice C is inconsistent with the paired Macaulay-ratio and modified-linear estimates; no distinct standard single-step error producing it is identifiable.
DChoice D is inconsistent with the paired Macaulay-ratio and modified-linear estimates; no distinct standard single-step error producing it is identifiable.
Original practice · fully worked
Original variant: comparing two duration estimates for a housing note
A housing note is worth 10,000 at 5% yield and has modified duration 4. Yield rises to 6%. Let M be the Macaulay-ratio estimate and L the modified-duration linear estimate. Calculate M − L.
A −20.00
B 0.00
C 9.71
D 20.00
E 40.00
Variant answer in brief
Macaulay duration 4.2 gives M = 9,609.71 while L = 9,600; the difference is 9.71, choice C.
Setup
Setup
The ratio approximation requires Macaulay duration, obtained by multiplying the given modified duration by 1.05.
DM=4(1.05)=4.2
Model
Model
Evaluate both estimates at the same one-point increase before comparing them.
M=10000(1.05/1.06)4.2=9609.7131
Compute
Compute
The ratio method gives 9,609.7131 and the linear method gives 9,600.
The 2210-page Financial Mathematics Proof Manual reorganizes 461 verified Exam FM solutions by syllabus skill and adds formula proofs, error patterns, and original worked practice.