This Exam FM sample reference tests Annuities and Perpetuities. Writing the payments as a level perpetuity of 4 plus twice an increasing perpetuity gives 4/0.06 + 2(1.06)/0.06² = 655.56, choice B.
These notes identify the calculation error associated with each wrong letter when that error is reproducible.
AChoice A is inconsistent with the level-plus-increasing decomposition of payments 6, 8, 10, …; no distinct standard single-step error producing it is identifiable.
CChoice C is inconsistent with the level-plus-increasing decomposition of payments 6, 8, 10, …; no distinct standard single-step error producing it is identifiable.
DChoice D is inconsistent with the level-plus-increasing decomposition of payments 6, 8, 10, …; no distinct standard single-step error producing it is identifiable.
EChoice E is inconsistent with the level-plus-increasing decomposition of payments 6, 8, 10, …; no distinct standard single-step error producing it is identifiable.
Original practice · fully worked
Original variant: perpetual maintenance grants with a fixed annual step
A district pays 10 at the end of year 1, 13 at the end of year 2, 16 at the end of year 3, and continues increasing by 3 each year forever. At 5% effective, find the present value.
A 1,000
B 1,200
C 1,400
D 1,600
E 1,800
Variant answer in brief
A level perpetuity of 10 plus a three-unit arithmetic increase has value 1,400, choice C.
Setup
Setup
Retain the first-payment level of ten and isolate the three-unit step that begins with the second payment.
PV=0.0510+3k=1∑∞(k−1)vk
Model
Model
The step component has discounted value one over i squared for each unit of annual increase.
k=1∑∞(k−1)vk=i21
Compute
Compute
At 5%, the level layer is 200 and the growth layer is 1,200.
The 2210-page Financial Mathematics Proof Manual reorganizes 461 verified Exam FM solutions by syllabus skill and adds formula proofs, error patterns, and original worked practice.