This Exam FM sample reference tests Redington Convexity Range. The liabilities have duration 8 and convexity 70. Feasible duration matching requires 4 ≤ n ≤ 8; the asset convexity condition reduces to (n−5)(n−7) < 0, so 5 < n < 7, choice B.
These notes identify the calculation error associated with each wrong letter when that error is reproducible.
AChoice A enforces only nonnegative asset weights and omits the strict convexity requirement.
CChoice C keeps the two boundary roots even though asset and liability convexities are equal there, not strictly ordered.
DChoice D selects the exterior of the quadratic roots, reversing the sign of the convexity inequality.
EChoice E intersects weight feasibility with the wrong exterior region of the convexity quadratic.
Original practice · fully worked
Original variant: verify a two-zero allocation
A liability portfolio has present value 50,000, Macaulay duration 10, and convexity 120. Assets are zero-coupon bonds maturing in 6 and 18 years. What fraction of asset present value belongs in the 6-year zero to match duration, and does the resulting asset portfolio satisfy the strict Redington convexity condition?
A 33.3%; no, convexity 84
B 50.0%; no, convexity 108
C 66.7%; yes, convexity 132
D 66.7%; no, convexity 120
E 75.0%; yes, convexity 126
Variant answer in brief
Duration matching places two-thirds of present value in the 6-year zero. The asset convexity is 132, exceeding 120, so choice C is correct.
Setup
Setup
Let f be the present-value fraction in the 6-year zero; one minus f is in the 18-year zero.
6f+18(1−f)=10
Model
Model
Solve the duration equation.
f=18−618−10=32
Compute
Compute
Evaluate asset convexity using the same present-value weights.
CA=32(62)+31(182)=132
132>120
Answer
Answer
The short-zero share is 66.7% and strict convexity protection holds, choice C.
The 2210-page Financial Mathematics Proof Manual reorganizes 461 verified Exam FM solutions by syllabus skill and adds formula proofs, error patterns, and original worked practice.