Original practice · fully worked
Original variant: diagnose a failed immunization
At a chosen yield, an asset portfolio and its liability have equal present value and equal Macaulay duration. The asset convexity is 84 while the liability convexity is 91. Which conclusion is correct under the Redington criterion?
- A
The portfolio is immunized because present values match. - B
The portfolio is immunized because durations match. - C
The portfolio fails because asset convexity is too low. - D
The portfolio fails because liability duration must be zero. - E
No conclusion is possible without coupon rates.
Answer and calculation
Present-value and duration equalities remove the zero- and first-order gaps, but the asset convexity must exceed liability convexity. Since 84 is below 91, the portfolio fails, choice C.
Setup
Setup
The first two Redington requirements are already supplied.
A=L,DA=DL Model
Model
Inspect the remaining curvature requirement for local surplus protection.
Compute
Compute
The stated figures have the opposite ordering.
Answer
Answer
The asset portfolio is not Redington immunized, so choice C is correct.
fails because CA<CL(C)